The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has become one of the most significant adjudicating bodies in India for matters related to corporate laws. Established under the Companies Act, 2013, NCLT in India functions as a quasi-judicial authority with the power to adjudicate issues related to companies, including disputes among shareholders, insolvency proceedings, and matters of corporate governance. Understanding its structure, powers, and jurisdiction is essential for anyone engaged in corporate or commercial activities in India.
Historical Background of NCLT
The concept of NCLT was introduced to consolidate the powers and functions of various authorities such as the Company Law Board (CLB), the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), and the High Courts in relation to company matters. Before NCLT, these bodies were separately handling company law disputes, resulting in delays and inconsistencies. The Eradi Committee, formed in 1999, recommended a unified body to ensure faster resolution of corporate disputes and insolvency cases. This recommendation ultimately led to the formation of NCLT in 2016.
The NCLT has been vested with wide-ranging powers under the Companies Act, 2013, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). It serves as the first point of adjudication for most corporate disputes, with appeals lying to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).
Structure of NCLT
The NCLT has been structured to ensure accessibility and efficient case handling. It consists of a Principal Bench in New Delhi and several regional benches across the country. Each bench comprises a Judicial Member and a Technical Member. The Judicial Members are usually former judges of High Courts or District Courts, while Technical Members are experts from fields such as corporate law, finance, and management.
As of now, NCLT has more than a dozen benches located in major cities, including Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata, and Ahmedabad. The distribution of benches helps in decentralising operations and providing localised access to justice.
Powers of NCLT
NCLT’s powers are extensive, making it a central authority for corporate dispute resolution. Some of the key powers include:
Adjudication of Company Law Matters
NCLT is empowered to hear and decide disputes arising under the Companies Act, 2013. This includes cases related to mismanagement, oppression of minority shareholders, and rectification of the register of members.
Approval of Corporate Restructuring
The Tribunal has the authority to approve mergers, demergers, amalgamations, and other forms of corporate restructuring. It ensures that such arrangements are fair, transparent, and comply with legal requirements.
Winding Up of Companies
NCLT has the jurisdiction to order the winding up of companies under specific circumstances, such as inability to pay debts, acting against the interests of sovereignty, or conducting fraudulent activities.
Insolvency Proceedings
Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, NCLT is the adjudicating authority for corporate insolvency resolution processes (CIRP). It appoints insolvency professionals, approves resolution plans, and can order liquidation when resolution is not possible.
Investigations
NCLT can order investigations into the affairs of a company based on applications from shareholders or the central government. It can appoint inspectors and direct companies to cooperate fully with the investigation.
Restoration of Companies
NCLT can restore companies that have been struck off from the register of companies, provided there are valid reasons and compliance with the prescribed procedure.
Rectification of Share Registers
Disputes related to wrongful entries or omissions in the share registers can be brought before NCLT for rectification.
Approval for Change in Financial Year
In certain situations, companies seeking to change their financial year need approval from NCLT.
Jurisdiction of NCLT in India
The jurisdiction of NCLT is wide and covers almost all significant aspects of company law and corporate insolvency. Broadly, its jurisdiction can be divided into:
- Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: NCLT handles cases related to the Companies Act, 2013, and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
- Territorial Jurisdiction: Each NCLT bench has territorial jurisdiction over specific states or union territories.
- Original Jurisdiction: NCLT acts as the court of first instance for corporate matters, meaning cases must first be filed here before going to appellate bodies.
The Tribunal’s jurisdiction does not extend to criminal matters under the Companies Act, which continue to be handled by criminal courts.
Role in Shareholder Disputes
One of the most notable roles of NCLT is in resolving disputes between shareholders and management. This includes cases of oppression and mismanagement under Sections 241–244 of the Companies Act. Minority shareholders often approach NCLT to protect their interests against unfair practices by majority shareholders or management.
In such cases, NCLT can issue a wide range of orders, including the removal of directors, alteration of the company’s articles, or even winding up the company in extreme situations.
Recent developments
SBI Singapore v. Shantanu Prakash
-
- Background: This case Involved sale of shares by SBI Singapore in US-based Learning.com held by Educomp Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (EAPPL), a Singapore-based subsidiary of Educomp Solutions. EAPPL was in liquidation under Singapore court, and SBI Singapore sold those shares as part of realization of its loan security.
- Key Issue: Whether NCLT (and by extension NCLAT) had jurisdiction to direct a fresh valuation of the shares of EAPPL.
- Ruling of NCLAT: NCLAT overturned the NCLT’s directive for fresh valuation, holding that the matter should have been addressed in the Singapore liquidation proceedings. It emphasized NCLT has no jurisdiction to order valuation of foreign subsidiary assets.
Max Publicity & Communication Private Limited. v. Enviro Home Solutions Private Limited
Background: Operational creditor Enviro Home filed Section 9 IBC application against Max Publicity. NCLT (Mumbai) rejected it but added adverse observations and forwarded the order to multiple authorities (SFIO, MCA, etc.) for investigation.
Key Issue: Whether NCLT has power to forward orders and initiate investigations under inherent powers, and whether that violated natural justice.
Ruling (NCLAT, May 2025): NCLAT clarified that NCLT may invoke its inherent Rule 11 powers to forward orders to statutory agencies but cannot direct SFIO investigations under Section 212. The adverse observations without giving an opportunity to be heard were found to breach natural justice.
Meesho Reverse Flip
-
- Background: Meesho, originally US-incorporated, sought NCLT approval to reverse-flip its Indian operations into the Indian parent in order to domicile back in India ahead of IPO.
- Development: NCLT (Bengaluru) granted approval to demerge Indian entities from the US parent.
Vedanta Demerger
Background: Vedanta planned a five-way strategic demerger (including Talwandi Sabo Power, TSPL), approved by shareholders in Feb 2025. NCLT (Mumbai) rejected the first-motion petition in March 2025 citing inadequate disclosures regarding liability pending towards SEPCO, a China based unsecured creditor.
NCLAT Order (May 2025): Granted an interim stay on the NCLT’s rejection, subject to Vedanta furnishing ₹1,245 crore bank guarantee to SEPCO; scheduled detailed hearing on August 4, 2025.
Integration with Insolvency Framework
The integration of NCLT with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has significantly enhanced its role in India’s corporate legal ecosystem. By acting as the sole adjudicating authority for corporate insolvency, NCLT ensures a streamlined process for creditors and debtors alike. The timelines under IBC are strict, with resolution generally required within 330 days, which has increased the pressure on NCLT benches to act efficiently.
Sectoral Compliance in Mergers and Amalgamations
An important dimension of NCLT’s functioning in mergers and amalgamations is its scrutiny of compliance with sectoral regulations. For instance, a merger between two banking entities must also satisfy Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines. Similarly, if the restructuring involves a listed company, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) regulations will apply. The NCLT plays a balancing role by ensuring that its approval process complements and does not contradict these sectoral compliance requirements. This multi-layered scrutiny strengthens the integrity of the restructuring process and instils investor confidence.
Approval of Schemes under Sections 230–232 of the Companies Act, 2013
Another significant function is the Tribunal’s involvement in the approval of schemes under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act. These sections provide the legal framework for compromises and arrangements between companies and their stakeholders. Here, the NCLT not only verifies procedural compliance but also assesses whether the arrangement is in the collective interest of all concerned parties. This includes analysing whether the proposed scheme addresses the concerns of secured and unsecured creditors, provides adequate protection to minority shareholders, and maintains operational stability.
Role in Cross-Border Mergers
Beyond domestic transactions, the NCLT’s role has expanded to cover certain cross-border mergers. With the introduction of provisions allowing mergers between Indian companies and foreign companies located in jurisdictions notified by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, the NCLT now serves as a critical link between domestic corporate law and international business operations. Cross-border mergers present unique challenges such as differences in accounting standards, shareholder rights, and insolvency frameworks. The Tribunal’s responsibility in such matters includes ensuring that the merger structure does not enable tax evasion, money laundering, or any form of regulatory arbitrage.
Addressing Shareholder and Governance Disputes
From a governance perspective, the NCLT has a key role in addressing disputes related to shareholder rights, directorial conduct, and corporate decision-making. In many cases, aggrieved shareholders or directors approach the NCLT under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, alleging acts of oppression or mismanagement. The Tribunal’s decisions in these matters have helped shape the jurisprudence on corporate democracy in India. It has the power to order changes in the composition of the board, direct alterations in articles of association, or even mandate the sale of shares to resolve conflicts.
Promoting a Culture of Compliance
The Tribunal also plays an indirect but powerful role in promoting compliance culture. Companies are aware that any non-compliance with corporate governance norms, whether in restructuring, board conduct, or shareholder treatment, can invite NCLT scrutiny. This preventive effect is as important as its dispute resolution function. Knowing that there is a specialised judicial body capable of taking corrective measures encourages corporate actors to maintain higher standards of transparency and accountability.
Interplay Between NCLT and IBC
Another evolving area under NCLT jurisdiction is its interplay with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). While IBC proceedings are primarily aimed at insolvency resolution, they often involve restructuring elements. In several cases, the resolution plan approved under IBC effectively results in a new ownership structure, operational overhaul, or merger of assets with another entity. The NCLT, as the adjudicating authority under IBC, ensures that these restructuring outcomes comply with both insolvency law and company law requirements.
Challenges in Handling Caseload
However, the Tribunal’s growing caseload has also brought challenges. Delays in hearing dates and order pronouncements can undermine the intended speed of corporate restructuring. While the establishment of additional benches and the appointment of more members have helped, there is still scope for procedural reforms to expedite hearings. The introduction of pre-packaged schemes for mergers, similar to pre-pack insolvency proceedings, could be one way to reduce the burden on the NCLT while allowing straightforward cases to proceed faster.
Significance for Foreign Investors
For foreign investors and multinational corporations, understanding the NCLT’s approach is critical before committing to significant investments in India. The Tribunal’s insistence on compliance, fairness, and transparency aligns with global governance trends, making India an increasingly credible jurisdiction for cross-border business. At the same time, the relatively new nature of the NCLT means that its jurisprudence is still evolving, and outcomes may sometimes be less predictable than in more mature jurisdictions.
Economic Impact of NCLT’s Role
The NCLT’s role also extends beyond the purely legal framework into the economic sphere. By enabling efficient corporate restructuring, it indirectly contributes to capital formation, market efficiency, and business growth. At the same time, by protecting stakeholder interests, it ensures that economic development is balanced with equitable treatment of all participants. This dual function positions the NCLT as both a guardian of corporate discipline and a facilitator of economic reform.
Challenges Faced by NCLT in India
Despite its importance, NCLT faces several operational challenges. The increasing volume of cases, particularly under the IBC, has led to backlogs in several benches. There is also a shortage of members, which sometimes delays hearings and decisions. Efforts are being made to address these challenges by appointing more members and increasing the number of benches.
Another challenge is the complexity of corporate disputes, which often require specialised knowledge in finance, accounting, and corporate governance. While Technical Members address this to some extent, there is still room for improvement in expertise and procedural efficiency.
Conclusion
NCLT stands as a cornerstone of corporate dispute resolution in India. With its wide-ranging powers, structured operations, and integration with the insolvency framework, it plays a pivotal role in ensuring corporate governance and resolving disputes efficiently. While challenges remain, the Tribunal’s contribution to the Indian corporate legal landscape is undeniable. For businesses, investors, and legal practitioners, understanding the structure, powers, and jurisdiction of NCLT is crucial to navigating the corporate environment effectively.
The NCLT’s jurisdiction in matters of corporate restructuring, governance, and cross-border transactions makes it a pivotal institution in India’s corporate landscape. While procedural challenges and evolving jurisprudence remain, its contribution to streamlining corporate processes, ensuring compliance, and safeguarding stakeholder rights is undeniable. As India’s economy becomes more integrated with the global market, the NCLT’s role will only become more significant, requiring it to continuously adapt to new business realities while staying true to its core principles of fairness, transparency, and legal integrity.
