Archives

Foundation Incorporation in the UAE — Exploring Jurisdictional Options and Practical Insights

In the dynamic landscape of the UAE’s business environment, choosing the right structure for incorporation can have a lasting impact on a venture’s regulatory flexibility, strategic positioning, and governance. Among various incorporation options, foundations are increasingly gaining prominence for asset protection, legacy planning, and governance structuring, especially among high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs), family offices, and cross-border...

July 29, 2025
McPatel vs. McDonald’s: A Defining Moment in India’s Trademark Jurisprudence

In a significant and unusual case unfolding in India’s intellectual property landscape, McPatel Foods Pvt Ltd, a Gujarat-based business, has brought legal action against the multinational fast-food conglomerate McDonald’s Corporation, challenging the latter’s claim of exclusive rights over the prefix “Mc” in India. The dispute not only raises critical questions regarding the scope of trademark...

India’s Investment Hotspots in Focus: Telengana

Telangana has emerged as one of the most investment-friendly states in India, thanks to its proactive governance, policy-driven approach, and growing infrastructure. In 2025, domestic and foreign investors continue to view the state as a promising destination for diverse investments across manufacturing, technology, pharmaceuticals, real estate, and green energy sectors. This article explores the latest...

July 29, 2025
Revival of Arbitral Authority: Calcutta High Court Reaffirms Limited Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act

In a significant pronouncement of 24th July 2025, the Calcutta High Court in M/s B.B.M. Enterprise v. State of West Bengal[1] reaffirmed the judiciary’s restrained role in arbitral matters under Section 34[2] of the Arbitration Act and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A&C Act”). The Court set aside the earlier judgment of the trial court[3], which had...

July 28, 2025
Enforcing Adjudicator’s Decisions in Smash-and-Grab Claims

The recent decision of the Technology and Construction Court (“TCC”) in VMA Services Ltd v Project One London Ltd[1] marks another significant judicial reaffirmation of the principles governing “smash-and-grab” adjudications. It also re-engages with the interplay between the statutory payment regime under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (as amended) (the “Act”) and...

July 25, 2025
Current Trends in India’s Patenting Landscape: Innovation on the Rise

India’s innovation landscape is rapidly evolving. From tech start-ups to research universities, and from government push to corporate strategy, patenting activity in India is gaining serious momentum. A recent brief by the Observer Research Foundation (ORF) highlights how India’s patent ecosystem is undergoing a remarkable transformation. But what’s really driving this growth—and what challenges still...

July 25, 2025
Extra Work, Valid Claim: Madras High Court Reaffirms Limits of Section 34 in Infrastructure Arbitration

Introduction In a significant reaffirmation of arbitral autonomy and judicial restraint, the Madras High Court in Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. SPML Infra Ltd.[1] has once again underscored the limited scope of interference with arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“A & C Act”). At the heart of the...

July 24, 2025
Time-Barred Claims Under MSMED Act: Supreme Court Clarifies Conciliation and Arbitration Rights in Sonali Power Equipments v. MSEB (2025)

Introduction In a landmark decision that brings clarity to the interplay between the Limitation Act, 1963, and the dispute resolution framework under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (“MSMED Act”), the Supreme Court in M/S Sonali Power Equipments Pvt. Ltd. v. Chairman, Maharashtra State Electricity Board & Ors.[1], has definitively ruled on...

Copyright © 2019-2024 ATB Legal Consultancy FZ LLC, All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Disclaimer

This website provides general information only, may not reflect current law, and should not be acted upon without professional advice.