


The right structure for an India trade operation is rarely the default one. Entity selection, distribution architecture, and payment routing are each a legal decision with commercial consequences that compound over time.
OUR TRADE & SUPPLY CHAIN STRUCTURING SERVICES
Trade and supply chain structuring sits at the intersection of corporate law, trade regulation, and commercial contract. A business that enters India through an unsuitable entity type, appoints a distributor on an unreviewed template, or routes cross-border payments without FEMA advice does not discover those errors at setup — it discovers them when a dispute arises, a regulatory query is received, or an acquisition due diligence exposes them. ATB Legal advises on the full structuring spectrum: from entity selection and FDI route analysis through to the commercial contracts that govern the trading relationship and the payment structures that keep it compliant.
The choice of India entity type is the first and most consequential structuring decision for a foreign company entering the market. The principal options — wholly owned subsidiary incorporated as a private limited company or a limited liability partner, joint venture incorporated as a private limited company or limited liability partnership, branch office which may or may not be incorporated as a private limited company — each carry distinct FDI compliance requirements depending on the depending on the chosen structure, tax treatments, operational capabilities, and exit implications. A wholly owned subsidiary incorporated as a private limited company under the Companies Act 2013 under the automatic FDI route is the most common structure for trading and distribution operations. A branch office may be appropriate for limited activities but carries permanent establishment risk. ATB Legal advises on the correct entity type for the specific activity, manages the incorporation or registration process, and structures the inbound investment to comply with the applicable FDI route.
For businesses trading across jurisdictions with FTA preferential tariff access, entity structure and supply chain design directly affect FTA eligibility. Invoice routing between related parties, the location of manufacturing or processing steps, and the characterisation of the transaction must all be consistent with the Rules of Origin requirements under the applicable agreement — whether the India-UAE CEPA, the India-Australia ECTA, or another FTA concluded by India’s Ministry of Commerce. A structure that maximises operational efficiency may inadvertently break the origin chain and forfeit the preferential tariff benefit. ATB Legal designs supply chain structures that satisfy Rules of Origin at every step, ensuring that the customs documentation issued through CBIC supports the preferential claim at the point of import.
The contractual architecture of a trading operation — distribution agreements, agency agreements, supply agreements — defines the commercial relationship and allocates legal risk. In India, the distinction between a distributor and an agent has significant consequences for tax, product liability, and regulatory exposure. Both require carefully drafted agreements covering territory, exclusivity, pricing, IP use, sub-distribution rights, compliance obligations under DGFT regulations, termination provisions, and post-termination restrictions. ATB Legal drafts and reviews distribution and agency agreements for India operations — ensuring the commercial relationship is correctly characterised and the documentation reflects the parties’ actual intentions.
Cross-border payment flows between an Indian entity and its foreign parent, supplier, or customer are subject to the Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999, administered by the Reserve Bank of India. FEMA regulates current account transactions, capital account transfers, and the documentation required for each category. Common structuring requirements include: correct characterisation of intercompany payments (royalties, management fees, and service charges each have their own FEMA treatment); advance remittance compliance for imports; repatriation of export proceeds within prescribed timelines; and Transfer Pricing documentation for related-party transactions. ATB Legal advises on FEMA-compliant payment structuring, reviews intercompany agreements for FEMA exposure, and coordinates with tax advisers on the Transfer Pricing overlay.

What entity should a foreign company establish for India trade operations?
The most common structure for a foreign company conducting trading or distribution in India is a wholly owned subsidiary registered as a private limited company under the Companies Act 2013, typically under the automatic FDI route, depending on the sector. Branch offices may be used for limited activities but carry permanent establishment risk. The correct entity type depends on the intended activity, the applicable FDI sector cap, and tax and operational considerations.
How does entity structure affect FTA tariff eligibility?
Entity structure affects FTA eligibility because Rules of Origin requirements analyse where value addition occurs and how goods flow between entities. Invoice routing between related parties, the location of manufacturing steps, and transaction characterisation all affect whether goods satisfy the applicable origin criteria. A structure designed without reference to the relevant FTA’s Rules of Origin may inadvertently forfeit preferential tariff access.
What is the difference between a distributor and an agent in India?
A distributor buys goods from the principal on their own account and resells to end-customers — the principal has no direct contractual relationship with the end-customer and is generally not liable for the distributor’s acts. An agent contracts on the principal’s behalf — the principal is directly bound by the agent’s acts within the scope of the agency. The distinction is recognized under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and has significant consequences for tax, product liability, and the ability to terminate the arrangement.
What FEMA compliance is required for cross-border trade payments?
Cross-border payments between an Indian entity and foreign parties are regulated under FEMA. Import payments require authorised dealer bank documentation and advance remittance compliance. Export proceeds must be repatriated within prescribed timelines. Intercompany payments — royalties, management fees, service charges — each have specific FEMA treatment. Related-party transactions also attract Transfer Pricing scrutiny.
Can a foreign company supply goods to India through a third-country entity?
Yes, subject to careful structuring. Routing goods through a third-country entity requires that the arrangement genuinely satisfies the applicable Rules of Origin, that the commercial documentation supports the origin claim, and that the entity structure is defensible for customs and tax purposes. Legal input at the design stage prevents the problems that commercially-driven routing arrangements typically create.
What contracts does a structured India trade operation require?
A complete trading structure typically requires: a distribution or agency agreement governing the India-side relationship; an intercompany supply agreement between the foreign parent and the India entity; an intercompany services agreement for management or support services between group entities; and, where applicable, a licence agreement for IP use in India. Each requires Indian law review rather than adaptation from an international template.

This website provides general information only, may not reflect current law, and should not be acted upon without professional advice.